PRG-14P4 Institutional ParticipationPhase 2-3

Public Service Professional Advancement

Representation at entry does not translate into representation at senior grades

💡 Suggest an improvement

Programme Logic

Problem

Representation at entry does not translate into representation at senior grades

Structural Cause

Career-long development and mobility opportunities are unevenly accessed

Intervention

Access to existing executive education, specialist training, cross-ministry exposure and structured mentoring, with participation monitored and published by grade band

Who & How

Target Group

Serving Indian officers in the federal civil service

Eligibility

Serving officers; merit-based selection into development programmes

Deliverables

Outputs

Participation in development programmes published by grade band; mentoring pairings established

Outcomes

More even grade distribution over time

Key Performance Indicators

KPI-14

Grade distribution

to-be-established

Distribution of Indian officers across grade bands

Baseline

Not published

Year 2

n/a - programme begins Phase 2

Year 4

Grade-band distribution published annually; participation in development programmes published

Year 6

Measurable improvement in the share of Indian officers in senior grade bands

Owner: Public Service Department (JPA)

Verification: JPA HRMIS

Note: Principally a transparency deliverable. The first requirement is publication, which does not currently occur.

Costing (Central Scenario)

Provisionalconfidence for this programme’s costing

Six-Year Total

RM 8.0m

New Funding

RM 2.8m

Existing

RM 4.8m

Reallocated

RM 0.4m

Where these figures come from

Why this figure?· RM 8.0m over 6 yearsProvisional

Method: Development-access and monitoring model
Key inputs: RM 0 — Uses existing INTAN and JPA programmes; MIB 2.0 funds outreach, monitoring and publication only
Population: Serving Indian officers in the federal civil service (Merit-based selection into existing development programmes)
Benchmark: Almost entirely a transparency and access measure delivered through existing capacity. Requires publication of grade-band composition, which does not currently exist.
Funding split: existing 0.60 = INTAN and JPA development programmes already funded and already open to these officers; reallocated 0.05 = MITRA grants; new 0.35 = outreach and the grade-band publication. ASSUMPTION (VAL-22).
Source: Internal estimate — no external source cited.
Status: Planning assumption pending validation· pending validation (VAL-22)
Note: Almost entirely a transparency and access measure delivered through existing capacity. Requires publication of grade-band composition, which does not currently exist.

View full costing scenarios →

Delivery & Accountability

Lead Ministry

Public Service Department (JPA)

Accounting Officer

Director-General of Public Service

Supporting Agencies

INTAN; ministries; Public Service Commission

Mandate Basis

Officer development and INTAN are JPA functions