PRG-13P4 Institutional ParticipationPhase 1-2-3

Public Service Application Pipeline Programme

Indian representation in the federal civil service is 3.7% (2024) against a population share of approximately 6.5%

Programme Logic

Problem

Indian representation in the federal civil service is 3.7% (2024) against a population share of approximately 6.5%

Structural Cause

JPA states the binding constraint is very low application volume from non-Malay candidates, who nonetheless record the highest appointment success rates - i.e. the failure is at application, not selection

Intervention

Career awareness campaigns through schools, universities and community networks; application guidance and completion support; examination and interview preparation; mentoring by serving officers; publication of an annual grade-disaggregated composition series

Who & How

Target Group

Qualified Indian graduates and school leavers eligible for public service entry

Eligibility

Meets standard JPA entry requirements; support is open and merit-based with no adjustment to entry standards

Deliverables

Outputs

Application volumes from Indian candidates published annually; preparation programmes delivered; annual grade-disaggregated composition series published

Outcomes

Indian share of the federal civil service rises from 3.7% (2024) toward a range of 4.2%-4.8% by Year 6

Key Performance Indicators

KPI-13

Public service participation

source-verified

Indian share of the federal civil service excluding RMP and MAF, reported alongside the absolute Indian officer headcount and the annual application volume

Baseline
3.7% of 1,302,429 officers, approximately 48,190 officers
Year 2
Application volumes published for the first time; grade-disaggregated composition series published; share at approximately 3.9%
Year 4
Share in the range 4.0%-4.3%
Year 6
Share in the range 4.2%-4.8%, equivalent to approximately 6,500-14,300 net additional Indian officers
Owner: Public Service Department (JPA)
Verification: JPA HRMIS; SPA application records
Note: The MIB 7% target is NOT carried into MIB 2.0. Reaching 7% would require approximately 43,000 net additional officers, which is not deliverable in six years (ASM-020). Reported as BOTH a share and a headcount because the denominator will itself change (ASM-021).

Costing (Central Scenario)

Provisionalconfidence for this programme’s costing
Six-Year Total
RM 21.0m
New Funding
RM 11.6m
Existing
RM 7.3m
Reallocated
RM 2.1m

Where these figures come from

Why this figure?Provisional
Method
Outreach and preparation model: campaigns + preparation programmes + annual data publication
Key inputs
RM 350RM350 per candidate through preparation programmes for approximately 8,000 candidates per phase, plus campaign and publication costs
Population
Qualified Indian graduates and school leavers eligible for public service entry (Open participation; no adjustment to entry standards)
Benchmark
RM350 per candidate through preparation programmes for approximately 8,000 candidates per phase = RM2.800m, plus RM4.200m per phase campaign, outreach and annual publication costs = RM7.000m per phase. Design follows the JPA-stated cause: the constraint is application volume, not selection outcomes.
Funding split
existing 0.35 = JPA and SPA recruitment administration already funded; reallocated 0.10 = MITRA human-capital grants; new 0.55 = outreach campaigns, preparation programmes and publication. ASSUMPTION (VAL-21).
Source
Internal estimate — no external source cited.
Status
Planning assumption pending validation· pending validation (VAL-21)
Note
RM350 per candidate through preparation programmes for approximately 8,000 candidates per phase = RM2.800m, plus RM4.200m per phase campaign, outreach and annual publication costs = RM7.000m per phase. Design follows the JPA-stated cause: the constraint is application volume, not selection outcomes.
View full costing scenarios →

Delivery & Accountability

Lead Ministry

Public Service Department (JPA)

Accounting Officer

Director-General of Public Service

Supporting Agencies

Public Service Commission (SPA); Ministry of Higher Education; Ministry of Education; universities; professional associations

Mandate Basis

Public service recruitment policy, HRMIS and workforce planning are JPA functions

Risks & Safeguards

RSK-18

reputational

MajorModerate

Publishing disaggregated ethnic data on civil service composition, school condition or poverty produces adverse comparison and political friction

Safeguard

Publication is committed to in advance as a condition of the plan, so selective disclosure is not available; data are published in full national context rather than for one community alone; the reporting framework is described as a model extensible to any community