PRG-09P3 LivelihoodsPhase 1-2-3

Household Progression Programme

Households receive assistance from multiple agencies at different life stages without any coordination, so support relieves a problem without changing the household trajectory

💡 Suggest an improvement

Programme Logic

Problem

Households receive assistance from multiple agencies at different life stages without any coordination, so support relieves a problem without changing the household trajectory

Structural Cause

Programme-centred rather than household-centred administration; no single household record; no follow-through

Intervention

A designated Progression Navigator per enrolled household at a caseload of 150 households, a single consent-based household progression record, coordinated referral to existing programmes, and periodic progress review

Who & How

Target Group

Low-income Indian households facing two or more simultaneous barriers

Eligibility

Household income in the bottom 40%; two or more concurrent barriers across documentation, education, employment, housing or debt; voluntary consent-based enrolment

Deliverables

Outputs

Approximately 120 navigators and 18,000 households in Phase 1, rising to approximately 400 navigators and 60,000 households cumulatively by Phase 3; case-management system operational

Outcomes

Enrolled households demonstrate measurable movement in income stability, employment, savings or housing security

Key Performance Indicators

KPI-09

Household progression

to-be-established

Proportion of enrolled households demonstrating measurable movement in at least two of: income stability, employment, savings, housing security, within 24 months of enrolment

Baseline

Not measured

Year 2

Approximately 18,000 households enrolled; progression measurement framework operational; first cohort baseline

Year 4

Approximately 40,000 households cumulatively enrolled; at least 40% of the Phase 1 cohort showing movement in two or more domains

Year 6

Approximately 60,000 households cumulatively enrolled; at least 50% of households enrolled for 24 months or more showing movement in two or more domains

Owner: Prime Minister's Department (delivery secretariat)

Verification: Household progression record (consent-based); independent evaluation

Note: Coverage is capped at approximately 10% of the estimated low-income Indian household population and is NOT universal. Enrolment is voluntary and consent-based.

Costing (Central Scenario)

Benchmarkedconfidence for this programme’s costing

Six-Year Total

RM 133.2m

New Funding

RM 66.6m

Existing

RM 13.3m

Reallocated

RM 53.3m

Where these figures come from

Why this figure?· RM 133.2m over 6 yearsBenchmarked

Method: Case-management model: (households / caseload per navigator) x loaded navigator cost x years, plus one-off case system
Key inputs: RM 72,000 — Loaded annual cost per navigator; caseload 150 households per navigator; 120 / 280 / 400 navigators; case-management system RM18m phased 12/4/2
Population: Low-income Indian households facing two or more concurrent barriers (Capped coverage: approximately 18,000 households in Phase 1 rising to 60,000 cumulative by Phase 3, i.e. approximately 26% of the 2014-basis low-income Indian household count of 227,600, or approximately 10% of all Indian households. NOTE: 60,000 is CONCURRENT capacity (400 navigators x 150), not cumulative reach; cumulative reach will exceed it given turnover)
Benchmark: Caseload of 150 benchmarked to intensive case-management practice. Phase 1: 120 x 72k x 2 = RM17.28m + RM12m system. Phase 2: 280 x 72k x 2 = RM40.32m + RM4m. Phase 3: 400 x 72k x 2 = RM57.6m + RM2m. Coverage is deliberately capped and is NOT universal.
Funding split: existing 0.10 = Department of Social Welfare case-work capacity already funded; reallocated 0.40 = MITRA welfare grant lines redirected from episodic aid to case management, the single largest reallocation in the portfolio; new 0.50 = the navigator cadre and case system. ASSUMPTION pending MOF and MITRA confirmation (VAL-28).
Source: Sistem Saraan Perkhidmatan Awam (SSPA) salary schedules - Pekeliling Perkhidmatan Bilangan 1 Tahun 2024 — Public Service Department (JPA)Tier 1 view ↗Provides basic salary only. The LOADING FACTOR applied in this costing to convert basic salary into a fully loaded employment cost is an assumption, not a sourced figure - see ASM-050.
Status: Benchmarked to a comparable programme or source· pending validation (VAL-17)
Note: Caseload of 150 benchmarked to intensive case-management practice. Phase 1: 120 x 72k x 2 = RM17.28m + RM12m system. Phase 2: 280 x 72k x 2 = RM40.32m + RM4m. Phase 3: 400 x 72k x 2 = RM57.6m + RM2m. Coverage is deliberately capped and is NOT universal.

View full costing scenarios →

Delivery & Accountability

Lead Ministry

Prime Minister's Department (delivery secretariat)

Accounting Officer

Chief Secretary to the Government (through the Director-General of the delivery secretariat)

Supporting Agencies

Department of Social Welfare; Ministry of Human Resources; Ministry of Housing and Local Government; MITRA; state welfare departments

Mandate Basis

A cross-ministry case-coordination function does not sit naturally in any single line ministry; the coordinating role is assigned to the delivery secretariat

All 2014-vintage figures are labelled by year and are not used for present-day statements; DOSM re-estimation of the Indian low-income household count and child cohort are gating validation items (VAL-02, VAL-09); the costing model rebuilds from assumptions by script, so a corrected population reprices the portfolio deterministically